Sewing and Suing Aren't a Happy Mix
The following article is from the Wall Street Journal.
Sewing and Suing Aren't a Happy Mix For Embroiderers --- High-Tech Stitching Brings With It Copyright Issues And Talk of Defamation
By Dionne Searcey
1,371 words
14 September 2006
The Wall Street Journal
A1
English
(Copyright (c) 2006, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
Janet Ebert, a longtime embroidery hobbyist, logged onto the Internet last year and found images of flowers and cuddly animals. Altering them with special software on her home computer, she created versions of the designs that she stitched on quilts for her five grandchildren. She used a computerized Singer embroidery machine, and sold some of the designs online for about $2 each.
A few weeks later, a courier appeared on Ms. Ebert's front porch in House Springs, Mo., with legal papers informing her that she was being sued. The complaint said she had violated copyright law and that some of the designs she had sold belonged to embroidery company Action Tapes Inc., in Dallas.
"Who in the you-know-what is this company?" Ms. Ebert, 61, recalls thinking. "I've never bought their designs, and I still don't buy their designs."
As this old-fashioned craft of decorative needlework goes high-tech with designs once sold by mail or in sewing shops, it has unleashed a 21st-century battle.
Sewing and design companies are engaging in piracy disputes similar to those waged by the music, movie and fashion businesses. Some buyers and sellers of designs are confused about the copyright issues buzzing around the honey bees and sunsets they stitch on quilts and clothing.
Embroiderers used to buy patterns of angels, flowers or other designs published by sewing companies at five-and-dime shops. They would iron the outlines of the designs onto fabric and stitch around them by hand, creating unique, colorful patches on clothing and blankets. Today, many buy digital forms of the designs from sewing company Web sites that offer downloads or disks. The designs are then executed by computerized sewing machines, costing as much as $7,000, that sew the images onto fabric.
The problem: Sewing companies license their designs for a few dollars each to consumers for their personal use. Designs commonly come with legal language explaining how they can be used. Still, some hobbyists then resell them on the Web as their own creations.
Fed up with such practices, the Embroidery Software Protection Coalition, a small group of sewing companies including Action Tapes, Great Notions Inc., Pfaff American Sales and others, aggressively began pursuing legal action against hundreds of embroidery buffs. Nearly 1,500 have been sent menacing letters on stationery stamped with the coalition's logo -- a stitched-looking letter "C" with a needle and thread attached -- that threaten them with steep fines and court judgments for buying counterfeit embroidery designs. Some of the letters tell the buyers the coalition will back off any legal action if they pay fees for their "past wrongful conduct."
Dozens of embroiderers took to online sewing forums to anonymously complain about the coalition's efforts, accusing the coalition of shaking down innocent sewers.
In turn, the coalition in June sent a subpoena to Yahoo Inc., which hosts one embroidery forum, to find the identities of sewers such as "suelikessewingtoo" and "nanaanniesews" so it can consider suing them for defamation, according to the coalition.
In its legal filings, it likened some of the stitchers' online screeds to "terrorist activities" and accuses them of posting slanderous statements "that marched across the Internet bulletin boards and chat groups similar to Hitler's march across Europe."
Gary Gardner, president of the coalition, says his group sometimes has no choice but to get tough, even with the little old ladies everyone agrees constitute the largest demographic of embroiderers. "Although they're a grandma, they're not a nice grandma," Mr. Gardner says. "Some of them are outright vicious, even when we point out to them what they're doing is illegal."
Some of the sewing companies say they have lost half their business to design pirates. Phil Newton, president of Oklahoma Embroidery Supply & Design, says that no more than three weeks after his company releases new designs, he sees them being resold online for a fraction of the price he charges. One of the largest producers of licensed designs in the U.S., his company offers 8,000 copyrighted designs for roughly $8 each. He recently found 250,000 designs, some of them belonging to his company, for sale online for just $49.
"We spend millions of dollars each year to make the products, advertise and pay royalties to artists," Mr. Newton says. "If we don't slow it down, there's not a lot of reason to be in this business."
According to the Craft and Hobby Association, a trade group, embroidery is among the most popular of the "needle arts" -- a $4.2 billion industry. And more hobbyists than ever are turning to digital sewing. Dozens of independent digitizers have sprouted up to peddle embroidery designs online, joining small design companies and sewing giants such as Viking Sewing Machines Inc. that sell designs to complement their sewing-machine sales.
The coalition has a team of investigators who troll online auctioneers such as eBay for obvious counterfeiters offering batches of thousands of designs for low prices.
One investigator bought CD-ROMs Ms. Ebert was selling on eBay last year that included copyrighted designs, coalition attorneys say. Ms. Ebert insists she sold only designs that were her own, which she created using free and legal clip art she found on the Internet. She calls the companies "the design police." The pending lawsuit in Missouri is seeking unspecified damages. An earlier lawsuit against her, filed in Texas, failed because of jurisdiction issues.
When the companies catch counterfeiters, some hand over names of their buyers as part of a legal settlement. In June, Sue Schultz, an embroiderer in Florida, received a letter from the coalition telling her some designs of trucks and cars her husband purchased for her in December 2005 were counterfeit. "We were shocked," Ms. Schultz says. "My stomach was completely upset."
When she phoned the coalition, she says, lawyers told her to send a $300 check to make amends. The coalition acknowledges that it sometimes resorts to such demands. Unsure of the legitimacy of the operation, Ms. Schultz did nothing, though she says she now buys designs exclusively from established sellers.
Ms. Schultz and others have complained on Internet forums about the letters that they say amount to a shakedown. Two of them have enlisted the help of an Internet privacy group called the Electronic Frontier Foundation to quash the subpoena sent to Yahoo, aiming to protect anonymity online and citing First Amendment concerns.
The coalition has since withdrawn the subpoena, but attorney Carole Faulkner says she is working on a new, narrower subpoena and still has plans to sue some forum members for defamation. Corynne McSherry, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says the coalition's "shotgun approach is aimed not at redressing defamation, but at intimidating those who have sought to raise public awareness of its ham-fisted tactics." She says she is pleased the subpoena was withdrawn. Yahoo declined to comment.
Faced with complaints from embroiderers as well as from some member companies, the coalition has revised its legal filings, toning some down a bit. The sewing companies acknowledge some sellers and buyers may not realize that the designs of common images such as angels and teddy bears are copyrighted. They say a campaign to raise awareness of copyrights has had little impact.
Ms. Ebert began her embroidery hobby when she was growing up on a farm in rural Missouri, stitching quilts by hand with her mother and grandmother to guide her. Digital embroidery is similarly satisfying but much easier, she says.
"When I have a lot on my mind or a lot going on in my life, I find that digitizing designs and sewing things puts my mind at ease and takes my mind off everyday problems," says Ms. Ebert, who threaded her first needle at age 10. "It's an enjoyment that gives me peace of mind."
It has been particularly soothing as Ms. Ebert has become tangled in a legal battle with the embroidery industry. She says she has embroidered three quilt tops in just two weeks.
Sewing and Suing Aren't a Happy Mix For Embroiderers --- High-Tech Stitching Brings With It Copyright Issues And Talk of Defamation
By Dionne Searcey
1,371 words
14 September 2006
The Wall Street Journal
A1
English
(Copyright (c) 2006, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
Janet Ebert, a longtime embroidery hobbyist, logged onto the Internet last year and found images of flowers and cuddly animals. Altering them with special software on her home computer, she created versions of the designs that she stitched on quilts for her five grandchildren. She used a computerized Singer embroidery machine, and sold some of the designs online for about $2 each.
A few weeks later, a courier appeared on Ms. Ebert's front porch in House Springs, Mo., with legal papers informing her that she was being sued. The complaint said she had violated copyright law and that some of the designs she had sold belonged to embroidery company Action Tapes Inc., in Dallas.
"Who in the you-know-what is this company?" Ms. Ebert, 61, recalls thinking. "I've never bought their designs, and I still don't buy their designs."
As this old-fashioned craft of decorative needlework goes high-tech with designs once sold by mail or in sewing shops, it has unleashed a 21st-century battle.
Sewing and design companies are engaging in piracy disputes similar to those waged by the music, movie and fashion businesses. Some buyers and sellers of designs are confused about the copyright issues buzzing around the honey bees and sunsets they stitch on quilts and clothing.
Embroiderers used to buy patterns of angels, flowers or other designs published by sewing companies at five-and-dime shops. They would iron the outlines of the designs onto fabric and stitch around them by hand, creating unique, colorful patches on clothing and blankets. Today, many buy digital forms of the designs from sewing company Web sites that offer downloads or disks. The designs are then executed by computerized sewing machines, costing as much as $7,000, that sew the images onto fabric.
The problem: Sewing companies license their designs for a few dollars each to consumers for their personal use. Designs commonly come with legal language explaining how they can be used. Still, some hobbyists then resell them on the Web as their own creations.
Fed up with such practices, the Embroidery Software Protection Coalition, a small group of sewing companies including Action Tapes, Great Notions Inc., Pfaff American Sales and others, aggressively began pursuing legal action against hundreds of embroidery buffs. Nearly 1,500 have been sent menacing letters on stationery stamped with the coalition's logo -- a stitched-looking letter "C" with a needle and thread attached -- that threaten them with steep fines and court judgments for buying counterfeit embroidery designs. Some of the letters tell the buyers the coalition will back off any legal action if they pay fees for their "past wrongful conduct."
Dozens of embroiderers took to online sewing forums to anonymously complain about the coalition's efforts, accusing the coalition of shaking down innocent sewers.
In turn, the coalition in June sent a subpoena to Yahoo Inc., which hosts one embroidery forum, to find the identities of sewers such as "suelikessewingtoo" and "nanaanniesews" so it can consider suing them for defamation, according to the coalition.
In its legal filings, it likened some of the stitchers' online screeds to "terrorist activities" and accuses them of posting slanderous statements "that marched across the Internet bulletin boards and chat groups similar to Hitler's march across Europe."
Gary Gardner, president of the coalition, says his group sometimes has no choice but to get tough, even with the little old ladies everyone agrees constitute the largest demographic of embroiderers. "Although they're a grandma, they're not a nice grandma," Mr. Gardner says. "Some of them are outright vicious, even when we point out to them what they're doing is illegal."
Some of the sewing companies say they have lost half their business to design pirates. Phil Newton, president of Oklahoma Embroidery Supply & Design, says that no more than three weeks after his company releases new designs, he sees them being resold online for a fraction of the price he charges. One of the largest producers of licensed designs in the U.S., his company offers 8,000 copyrighted designs for roughly $8 each. He recently found 250,000 designs, some of them belonging to his company, for sale online for just $49.
"We spend millions of dollars each year to make the products, advertise and pay royalties to artists," Mr. Newton says. "If we don't slow it down, there's not a lot of reason to be in this business."
According to the Craft and Hobby Association, a trade group, embroidery is among the most popular of the "needle arts" -- a $4.2 billion industry. And more hobbyists than ever are turning to digital sewing. Dozens of independent digitizers have sprouted up to peddle embroidery designs online, joining small design companies and sewing giants such as Viking Sewing Machines Inc. that sell designs to complement their sewing-machine sales.
The coalition has a team of investigators who troll online auctioneers such as eBay for obvious counterfeiters offering batches of thousands of designs for low prices.
One investigator bought CD-ROMs Ms. Ebert was selling on eBay last year that included copyrighted designs, coalition attorneys say. Ms. Ebert insists she sold only designs that were her own, which she created using free and legal clip art she found on the Internet. She calls the companies "the design police." The pending lawsuit in Missouri is seeking unspecified damages. An earlier lawsuit against her, filed in Texas, failed because of jurisdiction issues.
When the companies catch counterfeiters, some hand over names of their buyers as part of a legal settlement. In June, Sue Schultz, an embroiderer in Florida, received a letter from the coalition telling her some designs of trucks and cars her husband purchased for her in December 2005 were counterfeit. "We were shocked," Ms. Schultz says. "My stomach was completely upset."
When she phoned the coalition, she says, lawyers told her to send a $300 check to make amends. The coalition acknowledges that it sometimes resorts to such demands. Unsure of the legitimacy of the operation, Ms. Schultz did nothing, though she says she now buys designs exclusively from established sellers.
Ms. Schultz and others have complained on Internet forums about the letters that they say amount to a shakedown. Two of them have enlisted the help of an Internet privacy group called the Electronic Frontier Foundation to quash the subpoena sent to Yahoo, aiming to protect anonymity online and citing First Amendment concerns.
The coalition has since withdrawn the subpoena, but attorney Carole Faulkner says she is working on a new, narrower subpoena and still has plans to sue some forum members for defamation. Corynne McSherry, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says the coalition's "shotgun approach is aimed not at redressing defamation, but at intimidating those who have sought to raise public awareness of its ham-fisted tactics." She says she is pleased the subpoena was withdrawn. Yahoo declined to comment.
Faced with complaints from embroiderers as well as from some member companies, the coalition has revised its legal filings, toning some down a bit. The sewing companies acknowledge some sellers and buyers may not realize that the designs of common images such as angels and teddy bears are copyrighted. They say a campaign to raise awareness of copyrights has had little impact.
Ms. Ebert began her embroidery hobby when she was growing up on a farm in rural Missouri, stitching quilts by hand with her mother and grandmother to guide her. Digital embroidery is similarly satisfying but much easier, she says.
"When I have a lot on my mind or a lot going on in my life, I find that digitizing designs and sewing things puts my mind at ease and takes my mind off everyday problems," says Ms. Ebert, who threaded her first needle at age 10. "It's an enjoyment that gives me peace of mind."
It has been particularly soothing as Ms. Ebert has become tangled in a legal battle with the embroidery industry. She says she has embroidered three quilt tops in just two weeks.
posted by Talk To Us at 8:00 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home